World
Thursday, September 29, 2016
New Experimental Army Rifle Uses "Telescoped" Ammunition
World
Philippines President Duterte may not get what he wants in Vietnam after U.S. jibes
US to send 600 more troops to Iraq for Mosul offensive
Albuquerque (United States) (AFP) - The United States will send about 600 extra troops to Iraq to train local forces for an offensive on the Islamic State group stronghold of Mosul, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said Wednesday.
IS seized Mosul along with other areas in June 2014, but the country's forces have since regained significant ground from the jihadists and are readying for a drive to retake Iraq's second-largest city.
"These (US) forces will be primarily to enable Iraqi security forces, and also peshmerga, in the operations to isolate and collapse ISIL's control over Mosul," Carter told reporters on a work trip to New Mexico, using an IS acronym. Peshmerga are Kurdish fighters.
"Also to protect and expand Iraqi security forces' gains elsewhere in Iraq," he added.
The US forces will head to Qayyarah, a strategically vital air base 40 miles (65 kilometers) south of Mosul that will help funnel supplies and troops toward the city, as well as to other locations including the joint Iraqi-US Al Asad air base.
They notably will beef up flight capabilities at Al Asad for night operations and operations in low visibility, such as poor weather.
A US-led coalition is carrying out air strikes against IS in Iraq, and Washington has already authorized the deployment of more than 4,600 military personnel to the country.
Most are in advisory or training roles, working with Iraqi and peshmerga forces, but some American troops have fought IS on the ground, and three members of the US military have been killed by the jihadists in Iraq.
Earlier Wednesday, Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi's office indicated it had requested "a final increase in the number of American trainers and advisers" to support Iraqi troops in the northern city.
The statement from Abadi's office noted that US forces are helping Iraq in its battle against the jihadists. But their presence remains extremely politically sensitive due to the nine-year war the United States fought in the country.
The statement said the number of trainers and advisers would start to be reduced as soon as Mosul is retaken from IS, and also asserted that no American troops had fought alongside Iraqi troops.
In reality, American special forces have fought IS alongside Iraqi Kurdish forces on several occasions that have been made public, and likely in other operations that have not come to light.
Carter said the additional US forces would be tasked with training Iraqis, gathering intelligence and providing logistical support for the Mosul push.
"But I need to make clear... American forces combating ISIL in Iraq are in harm's way... no one should be in any doubt about that," Carter said.
How long they will stay is up to the Iraqis, Carter insisted.
"We are certainly to continue to help the Iraqi security forces in whatever measure and manner they wish to consolidate the control over their country after they've recaptured this last major ISIL center," he said.
According to Pentagon spokesman Navy Captain Jeff Davis, the new deployment is for 615 troops. That would bring total US forces in Iraq to 5,262.
The actual number would be higher than that because the tally does not include certain assignments.
The troops "will move very soon," Davis said.
- A million displaced? -
Carter expects the Mosul offensive to begin in the coming weeks, but stressed the decision was an Iraqi one.
IS has had two years to reinforce its defenses in Mosul, and observers are expecting a difficult fight amid a civilian population.
"We are prepared for whatever happens there," Carter said.
The United Nations warned that military operations there could cause as many as a million people to be displaced.
Last week, US President Barack Obama said US-backed Iraqi troops could be in a position "fairly rapidly" to liberate Mosul, though he warned "this is going to be hard, this is going to be challenging."
Separately, the US military concluded Tuesday that a rocket fired this month at the Qayyarah air base, which houses hundreds of US troops, contained no mustard agent, as initially suspected.
In neighboring Syria, hundreds of US forces are deployed alongside Kurdish and rebel fighters to battle IS, which is also facing air raids by the international coalition.
The Pentagon has expressed concern IS fighters could use mustard gas to defend Mosul.
Even after Mosul is retaken, the war against IS will be far from over.
The jihadists are likely to revert to insurgent tactics, such as bombings of civilians and hit-and-run attacks on security forces, following the demise of their so-called "state" in Iraq.Japan's Abe seeks breakthrough with Russia on long-disputed islands
By Linda Sieg and Nobuhiro Kubo
TOKYO (Reuters) - Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is betting that close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Russia's economic woes and regional concerns about China's rise will help him make progress in a decades-old territorial row when the men meet in December.
Abe, 62, who wants to leave a diplomatic legacy with a breakthrough in ties with Russia, may even alter a long-standing demand that the sovereignty of all four disputed islands northeast of Hokkaido be resolved before a peace treaty ending World War Two is signed, politicians and experts said.
Abe's courtship of Putin risks irking key ally the United States, given that Washington is feuding with Moscow over Syria and the annexation of Crimea, although Japanese diplomats have sought to ease American concerns.
"I will resolve the territorial issue, end the abnormal situation in which no peace treaty has been concluded even 71 years after the war and cultivate the major possibility of Japan-Russia cooperation in areas such as the economy and energy," Abe said in a speech to parliament this week.
Those bold pledges belie a tangled disagreement over who owns the islands off the northeast of Japan and Russia's eastern coast, while strong public opposition in Russia to compromise could limit Putin's room for maneuver.
But Abe, who has met Putin 14 times since his first 2006-2007 premiership, has a chance to make headway when he holds a summit with Putin on Dec. 15 in his constituency of Yamaguchi, in southwestern Japan.
They will also meet at gathering in Peru in November.
"For Mr. Abe, a breakthrough needs to be there," a senior Japanese government official said of the December summit.
"Mr. Abe in particular is trying to break the ice in the frozen situation on the peace treaty issue," he said, adding that Japan nevertheless did not expect an "overall resolution".
The territorial feud stems from the Soviet Union's decision in the final days of World War Two to seize the four islands - known in Japan as the Northern Territories and in Russia as the Southern Kuriles - that Tokyo says are its sovereign territory.
Japan has insisted that its sovereignty of all four islands be confirmed before a peace treaty is signed, but there are signs Tokyo may be rethinking that stance.
NEW APPROACH
"It might be possible to get things moving by going ahead with two (smaller) islands first," Masashi Adachi, director of the foreign affairs division of Abe's Liberal Democratic Party told Reuters, reflecting the thinking inside the ruling party.
"There would be a lot of opposition to giving in completely on the other two, but if it's a matter of postponing until a bit later, I think we could get public understanding," Adachi said.
Former Japanese lawmaker Muneo Suzuki, long involved in Russian affairs and now advising Abe, has advocated a similar proposal in the past.
"When we consider how to resolve the problem of the four islands, we cannot stop at the entrance. We have to look to the exit and make realistic suggestions," Suzuki told a news conference on Wednesday.
Last week, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga denied Japan had altered its basic stance, which risks angering hardliners among Abe's core supporters.
And for Moscow, agreeing to a peace treaty without settling ownership of the bigger islands could spark a domestic backlash.
"The Japanese side is relying on Putin's personal will," said Dmitry Streltsov, a professor at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations. "It seems they are overestimating the room for maneuver that is at Putin's disposal."
Still, some experts including Kazuhiko Togo, an ex-Japanese diplomat who once negotiated with Moscow, said this time might prove different from past failed diplomatic attempts.
One reason for guarded optimism is that Abe, who has already outlasted his recent predecessors since taking office in 2012, will likely be premier for at least two more years.
"In my opinion, there is a possibility to resolve the problem of a peace treaty while Putin and Abe are both in power," said Alexander Panov, a former Russian ambassador to Japan. "After that, it is unlikely."
DIPLOMATIC LEGACY
China's rising clout is a major factor encouraging Japan to court Russia. Sino-Japanese ties have improved from a low point four years ago, but Tokyo is worried by Beijing's growing military assertiveness and a feud over tiny East China Sea isles.
Abe's government also hopes a proposed menu of joint economic projects will be appetizing enough to win Russian concessions, given the pain inflicted on the Russian economy by low global oil prices and Western sanctions, experts said.
Abe has given trade minister Hiroshige Seko, a close ally, a special portfolio in charge of economic cooperation with Russia.
Access to Russian energy resources, meanwhile, would be a plus for Japan.
Abe has personal reasons for wanting to achieve a breakthrough that eluded his father Shintaro, foreign minister from 1982-1986.
"For Shinzo, realizing the dream of normalizing relations with Russia that Shintaro had in mind is one legacy that he wants to leave," former diplomat Togo said.
Skeptics, though, doubt a breakthrough is likely in December, although the summit could produce economic and security deals.
"(Russian) public opinion is strongly against the transfer of any territory whatever ... Japan is already providing economic cooperation," said James Brown, a professor at Temple University, Japan Campus.
"Why would Russia agree to this? It makes much more sense to string it out."
(Additional reporting by Dennis Dyomkin in MOSCOW; Writing by Linda Sieg; Editing by Mike Collett-White)Sunday, September 11, 2016
Charles Krauthammer: Incident in Hangzhou
US military: Iranian behavior getting worse in Persian Gulf
China's Next Territorial Claim: Hawaii and Almost the Entire Pacific Ocean?
Friday, September 9, 2016
Philippines' Duterte tells Obama he never cursed him
Why Vietnam is failing to unite its neighbors against China
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)